A Study on Shaping Academic Leadership in Thailand’s Public Universities

The Role of Legislation and Organizational Culture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46568/kubrj.v1i2.31

Keywords:

Scholastic initiative , Advanced education , Hierarchical culture , College administration

Abstract

This paper aimed to play out a basic examination of the pretended by enactment and hierarchical culture on scholarly initiative, to comprehend the possibility structure of any system of creating it. The examination addresses driving our examination are the accompanying: a) what are the invigorating impacts of enactment and authoritative culture on creating scholastic initiative? b) what are the controlling impacts of enactment and hierarchical culture on creating scholarly authority? furthermore, c) what is the impression of personnel staff in the Thai colleges on creating scholastic administration? The last inquiry is inspired by the way that this scholastic year in all Thai colleges there were races for the new overseeing bodies (ie: workforce gatherings and college senates) and new ministers, bad habit ministers, dignitaries and bad habit senior members of resources and division heads dependent on another enactment. Exploration results show that enactment and hierarchical culture are amazing forming powers of scholastic initiative, yet they need to unite to make the vital cooperative energy of progress. This investigation shows that the need to complete scholastic authority at colleges in Thailand is arising. Further exploration should zero in on down to earth approaches to change authoritative culture and inspire scholastic administration.

References

Ackroyd, P., & Ackroyd, S. (1999). Problems of university governance in Britain: Is more accountability the solution? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 171–185.

Arokiasamy, A. R. A., & Abdullah, A. G. (2012). Service quality and students’ satisfaction at higher learning institutions: a case study of Malaysian University competitiveness. International Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(5), 1-16.

Askling, B., Bauer, M. and Marton, S. (1999), “Swedish universities towards self-regulation: a new look at institutional autonomy”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 175-195.

Berdahl, R. (1990), “Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 169-180.

Birnbaum, R. (1991). Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision making [Special issue]. New Directions for Higher Education, 18(3).

Bleiklie, I., Enders, J. and Lepori, B. (2013), “Introduction: transformation of universities in Europe”, Higher Education, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 1-4.

Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., & Haslam, A. (2012). Academic Leadership: Changing Conceptions, Identities and Experiences in UK Higher Education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

Brennan, J. and Teichler, U. (2008), “The future of higher education and of higher education research: Higher education looking forward: and introduction”, Higher Education, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 259-264.

Currie, J. (2005). What makes shared governance work? An Austrian perspective. Academe, 91(3), 20–23.

De Boer, H. (2000). Paper presented at the OECD-IMHE Seminar, Tokyo. Institutional governance: Consequences of changed relationships between government and university.

Harman, Grant (2002). Academic Leaders or Corporate Managers: Deans and Heads in Australian Higher Education 1977-1997. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(2), 53-70.

Heifetz, Ronald & Donald, Laurie (1997). The Work of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, February, 124-134.

Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 155–176.

Ibrahim Komoo., Norzaini Azman., & Mazlin Mokhtar. (2009). Managing with a difference: Governing university research with innovation and creativity. Journal of the World Universities Forum. 2(4), 41–55.

Jose-Gines, M. (2001), “Governance and management in the new university”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 95-110.

Kettunen, J. (2008), “A conceptual framework to help evaluate the quality of institutional performance”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 322-332.

Khan, H. (2011). A literature review of corporate governance. In International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics (Vol. 25, pp. 1-5).

Kohtamaki, V. and Lyytinen, A. (2004), “Financial autonomy and challenges to being a regionally responsive higher education institution”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 319-338.

Kumar, A. (2007). Personal, Academic and Career Development in Higher Education: SOARing to Success. London: Routledge.

Meek, L. (2002). On the road to mediocrity? Governance and management of Australian higher education in the market place. In A.Amaral, G.A.Jones., & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 235–260). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Meek, L., & Davies, D. (2009). Trend in Higher Education Governance. Websites of University World News, 1.

Office of the Higher Education Commission (2017), University in Thailand, available at: www.mua.go. th/assets/img/university_mua1.pdf (accessed 25 August 2018).

Pongsriwat, S. (2008). Ethical leadership. Rajapbat Chiang Rai University, Thailand.

Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., Amaral, A., & Meek, L. (2006). Changing patterns in the middle management of higher education institutions: The case of Portugal. Higher Education, 52, 215–250.

Sarros, James; Gmelch, Walter & Tanewski, George (1998). The Academic Dean: A Position in Need of a Compass and a Clock. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(1), 65-88.

Sarwar, S., & Hussain, M. B. (2021). Why Professional Development Matters: A Case of College Teachers in Karachi. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 1(1), 26-37.

Siegal, W. & Stearn, J. (2010). Beat the Change Management Trap: Your Organization is More Ready to Change Than You Think. Leader to Leader, Winter 2010. Vol. 2010/55: 37– 44.

Somprach, K. (2003). Educational leadership. Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Sporn, B. (2006). Governance and administration: Organisational and structural trends. In Forest & Albach (Eds.) International handbook of higher education, (vol 18., pp. 114–147).

Trow, M. (1996). On accountability of higher education in the United States. In P.M. Masses & F.A. van Vught (Eds.), Inside academia: New challenges for academic profession. Utrecth: De Tijdstroom. Policy, 14(1), 14–31.

Unar, N., Arshad, M., & Shahnawaz, T. (2021). Measuring University Students’ Satisfaction Level on their Courses Experiences. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 1(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.48112/eassr.v1i1.49

Wiseman, A. (ed.) (2009). Educational Leadership: Global Contexts and International Comparisons. Bingley: Emerald.

Wolverton, Mimi; Gmelch, Walter; Wolverton, Marvin & Sarros, James (1999). A Comparison of Department Chair Tasks in Australia and the United States. Higher Education, 39(3), 333-350.

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Arokiasamy, A. R., & Tamah, A. (2020). A Study on Shaping Academic Leadership in Thailand’s Public Universities: The Role of Legislation and Organizational Culture. Karachi University Business Research Journal, 1(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.46568/kubrj.v1i2.31

Issue

Section

Articles